|
Post by Moldy Cheese on Dec 24, 2007 18:42:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Moldy Cheese on Dec 26, 2007 1:47:15 GMT -5
Stream of thought anyone? Monkeys, cheese, tomatoes, onions. wtf. That's my mind for ya. So if you don't like any of the above, then don't read this blog. Especially monkeys and cheese. Satirical writing is fun btw. Quite challenging as well.
With the New Year coming, I'd like to first and foremost wish everyone an excellent 2008.
I don't really know what to write about. My life really isn't interesting enough to write about. I could talk about how I climbed Everest solo or crossed the frozen tundra of the South Pole but no one would be interested in stupid things like that would they? Of course not.
No, I will utilize these pages to whine about things that I see as wrong in the world around me and not offer any thoughts on how to fix these perceived problems. It's fun to whine, everyone does it all the time. And it's even better when you don't offer a solution to the problem you're whining about because then, the problem will never be solved and you can keep whining. Sounds like a winning formula to me.
Also, it's a wonder to me on why people lock threads in the staff board. I think it's supposed to mean I'm not allowed to respond to the thread or I'm not supposed to, but I do it anyways just because I can.
And to conclude this wonderfully crafted entry, I will whine about the current president of the United States of America, our own Mr. George W. Bush. Like any intelligent person who follows mainstream media and popular opinion like a sheep in a flock, I know that Bush is a dumbo-head and that he knows nothing about running the country. He's responsible for the deaths of thousands in his quest for oil. He got into Yale via his family's connections and was a bloody cheerleader. He's basically the worst president...liek evar. But I will not point out his deficiencies any further than that. Because that's how whiners roll.
And just in case you were, in fact, wondering, I'm totally being serious and this entry was not a satire in any way.
Though I do disapprove of Bush's presidency.
|
|
Samus
Senior Member
That's messed up. :l
Posts: 258
|
Post by Samus on Dec 30, 2007 17:43:59 GMT -5
*Is now completely confused. Forevar *
|
|
Beeeeeel
Forum Prostitute
Official wA Name Trend Starter
Posts: 1,308
|
Post by Beeeeeel on Dec 30, 2007 20:30:04 GMT -5
*Is now completely confused. Forevar * GET OVAR URSELV.
|
|
Stinky666
Addicted Member
PSP is #1 Forever!
Posts: 1,202
|
Post by Stinky666 on Dec 31, 2007 18:13:19 GMT -5
Well, thats 2mins of my life wasted and that of which I will never get back. Thanks
|
|
Blink
Addicted Member
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by Blink on Dec 31, 2007 23:34:57 GMT -5
Well, thats 2mins of my life wasted and that of which I will never get back. Thanks You read slow...
|
|
Stinky666
Addicted Member
PSP is #1 Forever!
Posts: 1,202
|
Post by Stinky666 on Jan 1, 2008 4:07:25 GMT -5
Nah, I'm just always doing other crap. Chatting on MSn and shit
|
|
Samus
Senior Member
That's messed up. :l
Posts: 258
|
Post by Samus on Jan 1, 2008 5:29:20 GMT -5
Nah, I'm just always doing other crap. Chatting on MSn and shit Chatting on shit?
|
|
Beeeeeel
Forum Prostitute
Official wA Name Trend Starter
Posts: 1,308
|
Post by Beeeeeel on Jan 1, 2008 17:22:17 GMT -5
Nah, I'm just always doing other crap. Chatting on MSn and shit Chatting on shit? New messenger system by Yahoo.
|
|
|
Post by Moldy Cheese on Jan 10, 2008 23:34:38 GMT -5
Thoughts on Upcoming US Elections and Who You SHOULD Vote ForAlright, I'm gonna do some ranting in this post. I'm sick and tired of Barack Obama this, Hilary Clinton that, John Edwards this, John McCain that. Because, like it or not, it doesn't matter much which frontrunner you pick in the upcoming elections. Why? Because they all suck.None of these supposed frontrunners have struck any kind of impression on me. They cannot pick a position and they flip flop to satiate the masses of ignorant, media-controlled Americans. Obama being 'the candidate of change?' Please, spare me. It's all political dribble that's being eaten up by the young and foolhardy thinking that if they vote for him, then he'll fix up our fucked up country. The biggest reason he's gotten so much attention as the 'candidate for change' is because he's the darling of our corporate-controlled, biased TV networks. Hilary is a power-hungry loony who's riding the coat tail's of her husband's name. If it weren't for Bill, I doubt she would be a 'Democrat' at all. On Edwards, for pete's sake we know you came from the working class, so now what are you gonna do about it? But they are the ones who have whored themselves out to corporate America and now they have frontrunner status because of it. Sometimes, I wonder about the sanctity of the American political system. However, there is a bit of hope. Though not a lot. And it comes in packages labeled 'Dennis Kucinich' and 'Ron Paul.' I'll begin with Ron Paul. The darling of the Internet, he's a libertarian. I strongly disagree with many of his core ideas but it's his principle that draws me as a citizen. A return to the Constitution? Ending the War in Iraq and the War on Drugs? Amen to that. But, take those views and add in the left wing beliefs and you get Dennis Kucinich, who, in my opinion, is the real candidate for change. He's everything Obama says he stands for, and more. Except Kucinich is genuine. He's about the most genuine politician I've ever seen. How do I know? Well, first off, he doesn't take donations from the major corporations, unlike the other Democratic candidates. In fact, he's raised a measly 1 million for his campaign, in comparison to Clinton's massive 63 million. In debates he's participated in, he doesn't read eloquently scripted responses to the questions. Instead, he takes a moment to think about his response, and goes into a speech. A candidate actually thinking for him/herself?! Perposterous. However, because of his refusal to accept money from big corporations to be their bitch, he doesn't have the money to mount an effective campaign. Also, he's been basically blacklisted by our 'liberal media.' Well, who controls the media? Hmmm... He's painted as a short crazy elf man who claims to have seen a UFO. So what if he doesn't have the charisma of Obama? Last time I checked, charisma isn't a requirement to be an effective president. Some write him off as a crazy socialist who stupid liberal kids are enamored with. <sarcasm> You know what, they are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! We should instead, elect someone who feeds off of the milk of capitalistic corporations and promises change...yet...won't deliver in office. Hooray! If we do that, America's problems will be solved in NO TIME! </sarcasm> Sure, Kucinich's ideas might seem a bit idealist but hell, a little bit of hope never hurt anyone. I strongly suggest everyone to take a look at his positions and to check out some clips on YouTube. He won't win, but it's that defeatist attitude that keeps change from happening. You might as well start now by considering giving him your vote. By the way, I'm sure if Democrats and Independents voted their minds instead of dumbass reasons like 'electability,' then Kucinich would win by a landslide. Liberté, Égalité, Fraternitéen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kucinichwww.dennis4president.com/home/
|
|
Blink
Addicted Member
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by Blink on Jan 11, 2008 0:05:58 GMT -5
I'm not even an American and I want Kucinich to win.
Sometimes I can't stand Liberals actually....
Well-written Moldy Cheese, this sounds like something right out of a paper. Very readable.
|
|
|
Post by Moldy Cheese on Jan 11, 2008 0:16:48 GMT -5
Thanks Blink.
It's quite disturbing what the media has done. It's basically turned the words "liberal" and "conservative" into insults, when really, it shouldn't really matter as long as their positions are legitimate and sensible. And people do need to get themselves better definitions of liberal because the meaning's been skewed so much. Liberalism isn't bad. It's just people who call themselves liberals/Democrats that give liberalism a bad name. And fodder for Fox News.
And while he's dismissed as some as a socialist nut in America, Kucinich would really just be a regular left-wing candidate in most European countries. Such is the extent that America is controlled by right wingers.
|
|